Blue Skies in Camelot (Continued): An Alternate 80s and Beyond

My idea was that she was born in France; her father is from Algeria and her mother is French. Although come to think of it the character of Bradamante is a warrior woman who falls in love with a Muslim knight. That could be an interesting angle to explore instead.
Oh yeah definitely and I like that idea. Maybe it could be part main story and part short story.
 
Given what's been coming out about Francis Ford Coppola's new movie, do you think he'd end up getting heat from the "And So Have I" movement?
 
All of these and more would eventually be released on Nintendo’s “Advanced Video System”, a redesign of the company’s earlier “Famicom” console, set to be released on the North American market, distributed by Atari, Inc. Though originally plans were made for an advanced 16-bit console that was really more of a home computer-hybrid, these were later scrapped. Nintendo management feared that the keyboard and other accessories would “overwhelm” non-technophiles and “frighten off” the emerging market of “casual” video game fans.
If the 5200 is not a failure, Atari have zero Need for the famicom, OTL Nintendo was offering it in the CES and Kassar, desesperated after 5200 failure was the one to give it a preliminary offer..that become a disaster as the atari engineers were desperate to push their hardware(what would become the 7800) and stalling the deal, Kassar being fired killed the deal
 
Last edited:
I say that the OTL hardliner coup doesn't happen because he's more savvy with the KGB than in OTL. Remove that, and the otl style collapse is butterflied.

He holds a referendum for each republic to choose whether to stay or leave.

The Baltic States, Moldova, Georgia and Armenia leave. The rest stay, and the USSR transforms into a resource-export economy, for the short term when native capitalistic industry finds its feet.

I think there would be a 'Parade of Republics' in the 90s where places like Chechnya, Dagestan, Yakutia and Buryatia all become full fledged SSRs.

Democracy, with multiple parties can only come in the 2000s after one byzantine system is replaced with another and people are satisfied with things.
I like these ideas a lot as well. When deciding what to have happen in TTL, I try to strike a balance between historical determinism and wide-eyed idealism, realism, so to speak. Too much of the former and you have a (in my opinion) fairly boring timeline where only the window dressing changes from OTL. Too much of the latter, however, and you end up in ASB territory, where you hand waive problems and say things work out of sheer rule of cool. I do believe that the collapse of the USSR was a disaster not just for Russia, but for much of the world in the sense that it created instability and the conditions which allowed for the rise of a revanchist Russia (that's all I'll say about that to avoid current politics).

Even if Gorbachev can't fix everything (which, let's face it, would be impossible), if he can manage the transition of the USSR into the Union State, with increased openness and desperately needed economic reform, then that will be a more hopeful outcome in my view. Perhaps he can prevent the takeover of Russia's economy by the oligarchs and make a somewhat more equitable society.

I had an idea for a fictional series in this world, but I was hoping that some others might be able to help flesh it out into something more concrete.

1.) Epic/Gritty Epic Fantasy: The writer is French citizen of Algerian and French heritage, and the series itself is modelled on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_of_France
More specifically, the World itself is inspired from that time (Charlemagne's conquests would be a major source of inspiration, and the powers would be modelled on Europe during Charlemagne's time. For instance, there are expies of the Carolingians, the Byzantines, the Caliphates are combined into a single power, the First Bulgarian Empire, even the Vikings.) There's references to the Ravennan Empire in the past, with the ultimate antagonist being a fallen angel trying to manipulate both the Caliphate Expy and Carolingan France expy into a destructive war.

In many ways it's similar to Game of Thrones, and ultimately becomes popular not just in France, but in America and the UK. Funnily enough, there are people on both the left and right who dislike it (The right hates the message of racial and religious tolerance, while the left thinks that Charlemagne's atrocities were somewhat whitewashed.)
This sounds awesome. I am totally here for it.
 
I like these ideas a lot as well. When deciding what to have happen in TTL, I try to strike a balance between historical determinism and wide-eyed idealism, realism, so to speak. Too much of the former and you have a (in my opinion) fairly boring timeline where only the window dressing changes from OTL. Too much of the latter, however, and you end up in ASB territory, where you hand waive problems and say things work out of sheer rule of cool. I do believe that the collapse of the USSR was a disaster not just for Russia, but for much of the world in the sense that it created instability and the conditions which allowed for the rise of a revanchist Russia (that's all I'll say about that to avoid current politics).

Even if Gorbachev can't fix everything (which, let's face it, would be impossible), if he can manage the transition of the USSR into the Union State, with increased openness and desperately needed economic reform, then that will be a more hopeful outcome in my view. Perhaps he can prevent the takeover of Russia's economy by the oligarchs and make a somewhat more equitable society.
I fully agree with you, sir. A fine balance is needed. Despite my own skepticism of the USSR's chance of survival, I wish Gorbachev all the good luck and best wishes in his attempt to reform the Soviet Union, given how incredibly difficult it is.

Judging from what you stated, Mr. President, it seems the more likely scenario in this timeline is that once Gorbachev took power and, against all odds, managed to reform the USSR, a cautious detente would ensue between the West and the East. My guess is that a series of several international summits would take place throughout the late 1980s and early 1990s, originally intended to discuss arms control but later on became heavily focused on normalizing East-West tensions and allowing the United States and quickly-liberalizing Soviet Union to work jointly as global leaders. This would culminate in a summit, in which representatives from both global superpowers would declare a total reset of their diplomatic relations and an official end to the Cold War.
 
Given what's been coming out about Francis Ford Coppola's new movie, do you think he'd end up getting heat from the "And So Have I" movement?
God almighty, it seems like there are so many famous celebrities and public figures who became famous in the late 60s - 80s who are shady and do a lot of questionable things. Let's hope the TTL "So Have I" movement helps shed light on this issue.
 
God almighty, it seems like there are so many famous celebrities and public figures who became famous in the late 60s - 80s who are shady and do a lot of questionable things. Let's hope the TTL "So Have I" movement helps shed light on this issue.
While we're on this subject, I'm kind of curious about how this would affect Roger Corman. While his movies were often considered cheap and sleazy (and nudity was often inserted into scripts to help sell them), I've never heard anything about there being any accusations against Roger Corman. Hell, while his movies did tend to have a lot of nudity, he would be willing to find workarounds if actress weren't willing to do it. So weirdly, I feel like he could survive the movement with little more than a few think pieces being written.
 
While we're on this subject, I'm kind of curious about how this would affect Roger Corman. While his movies were often considered cheap and sleazy (and nudity was often inserted into scripts to help sell them), I've never heard anything about there being any accusations against Roger Corman. Hell, while his movies did tend to have a lot of nudity, he would be willing to find workarounds if actress weren't willing to do it. So weirdly, I feel like he could survive the movement with little more than a few think pieces being written.
True. I mean Corman is well respected and known to be an excellent employer, he just caters to what people want.
 
True. I mean Corman is well respected and known to be an excellent employer, he just caters to what people want.
Honestly, I could see his reputation possibly getting better as this goes on. I mean, IOTL it was actually considered somewhat shameful to work for him, but I don't think that's going be the case when more mainstream producers are outed as creeps.
 
I like this prediction. Especially the parts where he holds a referendum to allow countries to choose their own presidency. Do you think he would abolish the office of Secretary-General and make it so that the reformed Soviet Union for Russia and the countries that stay can instead elect a President with a term limit?
I was playing with a timeline for the Imperial Federation which might apply here.


The Imperial Federation's Government Structure.

Legislative:

Dominions: Each dominion has its own assembly. Dominions with royalty (Britain, India and many Dominions in Africa) have Bicameral Houses with a full house of Lords.

Federation: The Imperial Parliament in London houses representatives from all parts of the Empire, in which all the parties that contest the dominion elections are eligible to stand. There is proportional representation per dominion.

The Important Dominions have a proportion akin to something like this:

Britain: 10 seats
India: 5 seats
Australia: 4 seats
South Africa: 3 seats
Ireland: 3 seats
Canada: 3 seats
New Zealand: 2 seats

The same applies to other dominions.

Crown Colonies: Territories too small to be granted full dominion status, ruled directly by the Imperial Parliament with only local issues handled on site. They may petition a dominion for their issues to be heard on the Imperial Parliament.

Examples include Gibraltar, Hong Kong and the Falkland Islands.


Executive:

Dominions: Each dominion has a Premier, who is the head of Government and handles issues and passes laws on the Dominion level. (Imperial law supersedes dominion law if they clash.)
Each dominion has a Governor-General who is the monarch's representative in said dominion.
Royals, where applicable, do have extensive British titles and pay allegiance to the House of Windsor.

Federation: The Prime Minister (mostly British, but there have been a few Indians and Australians) is the head of government and the Monarch is the head of state. The Federation is presented as one on the International stage.


Judicial:

The Imperial Court in London is the highest court in the federation with each dominion having Supreme Courts and lower courts to go with it.
Any verdict passed by the Imperial Court is final.
Its duty is to interpret the Imperial Constitution and check the other branches.


This can be modified to fit a Soviet, non-monarchical context I think.
 
Top